If only two good things become one - Wolfroogle!
As usual, I’m crawling the web again. I think this has become part of me, what I do as job; and just me being a geek.
I came across this new search engine which looks similar to like Google, it calls itself - WolframAlpha. What do I mean looks like? They both have a common layout - clean, and that is what appeals to users. And of course, a text field for you to key in your query. When you tell someone, it’s a search engine and immediately people will link it to Google. I beg to differ. I did a few tries on Wolfra and realized the difference immediately.
Google gives you search results of your keywords, just like a typical search you’d performed in your Word document. Type “Best club in Singapore” and it’ll return gazillion results of strings that has the word in it. You’ll definitely get something by simply just input a word and hit the search button on Google. Unlike Wolfra, you don’t always get result. No it’s not broken. Wolfra is meant to ‘answer’ your query, and not looking up the indexes. I input “best club in Singapore” on Google and I get more than 17,000 hits. While on Wolfra, it sounded like a broken record; repeating “Wolfram|Alpha isn’t sure what to do with your input” to me. Perhaps the computer engine behind Wolfra hasn’t gone out of its box to hit the clubs in town, it wasn’t sure about what I’m looking for. Not convinced enough, I did another search on “what is H1N1″ on both engine. Wolfra gave me the answer almost immediately, indicating “Assuming “h1n1″ is a disease | Use “h1″ as referring to math instead” with a few references and infected cases below the descriptions. How nice! I do not have to click on any external links to look up for the details.
While I don’t see Wolfra as Google’s rival, since they are in a different reign. I do think there will be a significant number of users swinging over to Wolfra for direct answers. Well, still early to tell now.











